What a governed content pipeline is
Most content tools store files and hope the rules are followed. A governed pipeline enforces them: isolation between clients, valid rights on every asset, and disclosure on anything AI touched — checked on the path the content actually travels, from capture through final delivery. The interface is a projection of what the system already decided; it cannot show what the rules forbid.
Security is a property of the database, not a paragraph
Isolation, rights, AI disclosure, and approval are enforced on every egress path — and when a check cannot run, delivery is refused rather than allowed.
Postgres row-level security on every table and every request. Cross-tenant access is refused at the database, not filtered in the app.
Assets carrying AI-generated or composite provenance are gated at delivery by a database check that runs on every download and DAM export. Fail-closed: if the check cannot run, nothing ships.
Each download re-checks rights validity and expiry, then mints a short-lived signed URL. The client cannot assert its own compliance.
Running a formal process? Send us the RFP →
Built for a content supply chain, not one company
A brand owns the asset and the approval gate; an agency coordinates the work under a scoped, revocable grant; a studio produces it and keeps its cost and margin private. WorkFreq models Studio, Agency, and Brand as first-class organization types, so governance stays intact across company lines — in one system of record instead of three.
Every delivery logged, every role gated
MFA on every non-guest role, ten canonical roles gated in the database, and approvals, agent runs, and deliveries written to an activity log. White-label guest galleries stay invisible until a named approver releases them. See the compliance model →
Before you ask
What is a governed content pipeline?
A single system where every asset is captured, composed, reviewed, approved, and delivered under enforced rules — isolation, rights, and AI disclosure — rather than promised in a policy. In WorkFreq those rules live in the database, so the app cannot route around them.
How is this different from a DAM?
A DAM stores and organizes files. WorkFreq governs the pipeline from capture to delivery and enforces isolation, rights, and AI disclosure on every egress path — fail-closed, not fail-open.
Is it ready for enterprise vendor review?
Yes — row-level isolation, MFA on every non-guest role, rights re-checked on every download, and a full activity log. Access matrix and vendor-review pack available under NDA.