Platform  /  Governed pipeline  /  AI compliance
AI governance · Regulated enterprise

AI that proposes, never disposes.

Ship AI-assisted content at the speed your team needs without inheriting the compliance risk. WorkFreq gates AI disclosure, enforces rights at egress, and isolates every tenant — all in the database, checked on every delivery, fail-closed by default.

The problem AI created

Speed is easy. Cleared-to-ship is the hard part.

AI shortens the edit, but 2026 disclosure rules turn labeling, likeness consent, and rights clearance into a procurement question. Speed only counts if the asset is cleared — and a policy document does not clear anything. WorkFreq turns the policy into an enforced gate on the path content actually travels.

EU AI Act Article 50

Disclosure is a gate, not a checkbox

Assets carrying AI-generated or composite provenance are gated at delivery by a database check that runs on every download and every DAM export. It is fail-closed: if the check cannot run, nothing ships.

ProvenanceTracked to the asset

AI-generated and composite provenance travels with the asset, so the disclosure decision is made on data, not on someone remembering.

EnforcementOn every egress

The gate runs on each download and each connector export - not once at upload where it can drift out of date.

Failure modeFail-closed

If the compliance check cannot complete, delivery is refused. The safe default is "do not ship," not "ship and hope."

Compliance is not legal advice; WorkFreq gives your team the enforced controls to operate the policy you set. Running a formal process? Send us the RFP →

Human in the loop

Propose-only by default, kill switch per tenant

Every agent action is scoped, rate-limited, logged, and human-reviewed. Facts ship only with confidence and corroboration; single-source claims are flagged, not published. Each tenant sets its own AI posture — propose-only or reversible, contracted-only egress — down to a database-level kill switch. Bring your own model: Anthropic, OpenAI, Azure, Google, or self-hosted.

Rights & isolation

The other two gates on every delivery

AI disclosure rides alongside rights enforcement (each download re-checks validity and expiry, then mints a short-lived signed URL) and row-level tenant isolation (cross-tenant access refused at the database). One egress path, three enforced gates. See the full governed pipeline →

Common questions

Before you ask

How do you handle EU AI Act Article 50 disclosure?

AI-generated or composite assets are gated at delivery by a database check on every download and DAM export. Fail-closed: if it cannot run, the asset does not ship.

Does the AI publish on its own?

No — propose, never dispose. Agent actions are scoped, rate-limited, logged, and human-reviewed, with a per-tenant kill switch.

Where are the rules enforced?

In the database, on the egress path — not in app code that could be bypassed. Isolation, rights, and disclosure are all checked when content leaves.